‘This Is Called National Defense’

November 11, 2007

The following is an unpublished passage written by Joseph Heller that was printed in the New York Times at some point in the mid-1970’s. I found it in a newspaper clipping while I was cleaning out a deceased relative’s belongings from a closet. It is and will probably remain the single most scathing piece of literature that I have ever read, and manages to sum up my feelings about the government in under 300 words. Read the full piece after the jump.

*EDIT: I removed the date that the piece was written. It couldn’t have been written in ‘65 because MLK was murdered in ‘68. The actual newspaper clipping says 1965, so you can blame the Times copy desk for the slip up. Thanks to peppergomez from Digg for pointing that out.

**EDIT: I took a screenshot of the PDF of the piece from the New York Times archive. I hope this clears up any questions about proper sourcing. Check out the screenshot here:

http://tovoteornottovote.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/proof-pudding/

There is no official title, however the headline of the clipping reads as follows:

‘This is called National Defense’

I was a little more perturbed than the next fellow, I’d say, when I learned shortly after his assassination that Martin Luther King’s telephones had been tapped and his living quarters bugged, and that the recorded tapes thus obtained were played many times for the private entertainment of various F.B.I. officials and certain journalists friendly to the F.B.I., who, chortling, all added ribald comments of their own to the personal conversations on which they were eavesdropping so shamelessly.

This tapping and bugging of Martin Luther King was carried out by salaried government employes, with the knowledge and consent of some very distinguished people in high public office, not one of whom, it seems, has yet been executed for this trespass, or even imprisoned, discharged, demoted, or censured. This is called national defense.

I wish that all these gentlemen who so gallantly stand for such national defense would begin tapping and bugging each other’s telephones and living quarters and spitting in each other’s soup, and stop interfering with such decent people as Socrates, Martin Luther King, Eugene V. Debs, Galileo, Jesus Christ, and me.

I never express this disapproval aloud, of course. I would not dare mention it at the office or to my closest friend of even whisper it to my wife in the intimacy of our bedroom, because these courageous guardians of our freedom and safety might be bugging me already and would then start spitting in mine. This is called internal security.

I met an F.B.I. man once at a quiet dinner party who had close-cropped hair and obsessive hostility toward pornography and people who smoked marijuana. He looked like an astronaut.

So did his wife.

Entry Filed under: Advocates/Leaders, america, government, news, politics, wiretapping. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

40 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Anonymous  |  November 12, 2007 at 12:45 am

    uhhhhhhh

    Reply
  • 2. Ste  |  November 12, 2007 at 12:54 am

    such a reaction means you are dumb. Enjoy your vacuous life.

    Reply
  • 3. Anonymous  |  November 12, 2007 at 12:54 am

    Prepubescent drivel. No wonder it was never published, it’s not worthy of that sort of recognition. And whomever decided it was worthy now must be quite frustrated to dip this deep.

    Reply
  • 4. Fergi  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:01 am

    Joseph Heller is a genius.

    Reply
  • 5. Anonymous  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:02 am

    I think its interesting to see how the government has used wire tapping in the past towards individuals it deems threatening.

    I wonder what people of note today are being recorded and taped that some may recognize as outspoken critics that may threaten the stability of our government.

    Reply
  • 6. Anonymous  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:09 am

    Where is the rest of the piece?

    Reply
  • 7. howtowritearesumes  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:11 am

    Wtf is an astronaut, and what does this have to do with how to write a resume?

    Reply
  • 8. Cheyne Strong  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:19 am

    This really isn’t that impressive.

    Reply
  • 9. Ian  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:22 am

    Well, I wouldn’t call this the most scathing political piece ever written (that’s the Digg headline, fyi). But the guy is rightfully pissed at the prospect of domestic spying — which is how everyone ought to feel right about now. Too bad we’re too lazy and dumb to realize that’s what’s happening.

    Anybody up for a glass of victory gin?

    Reply
  • 10. mike  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:33 am

    dear anonymous 3: one of the so many things they’d never teach us in school(except maybe in germany), is how essentially incompetent each of us is to grasp anything. why? most of us will never wonder , the rest, they already know.

    Reply
  • 11. aguanegro  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:01 am

    The except was the only part of the work that was published in the New York Times. I should probably note that at the time this appeared in print, Heller had just released “Something Happened”, his first novel in thirteen years since “Catch-22″. Readers were quite eager to read his follow-up novel, although “Something Happened” wasn’t as well received. With this in mind, I think it’s pretty safe to say there was probably another reason why the excerpt wasn’t published, rather than it being “prepubescent drivel.”

    Reply
  • 12. Anonymous  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:01 am

    I must be an idiot, but where is the jump after which I can read the whole thing?

    Reply
  • 13. Anonymous  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:04 am

    Prepubescent drivel? This is James Heller we’re talking about. Acknowledged to be an accomplished writer. Good thing you aren’t an editor. You’d starve.

    No wonder it was never published? Can you read? It was published in a newspaper.

    “Whomever decided it was worthy now must be quite frustrated to dip this deep?” Buddy, whoever you are, you’re going to have to do better than this when someone’s objection to the way the government trashed a decent man’s reputation offends your wacko sensibilities — whatever they are.

    I don’t think I’ve ever read a lamer post in my life.

    Reply
  • 14. aguanegro  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:06 am

    The line about the astronaut is the last sentence of the excerpt, that’s it. The “jump” is just the break where you click “more” on the front page.

    Reply
  • 15. red  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:09 am

    AT&T or the governemt itself s spying on all this internet traffic anyway. Ya we are all being spied on , probably all the time. If not directly under the nose, then logged away for future reference if deemed necessary… sigh… it is rather disapointing that our taxes (and callphone charges) are being used to pay for it. Don’t like it… put your new shoes in the microwave and say suspicoius things over the phone, to destry or at least distract. Good luck and good night

    Reply
  • 16. derekguy  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:22 am

    Clever. Subtle. I like it. I am glad I live in a small country where our politics are complicated yet on such a small scale compared to yours. Makes me want to buy an island and raise goats.

    Reply
  • 17. come on  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:28 am

    This was a total waste of time. No reference, unsubstantiated accusations and pure drivel. sorry i followed the link.

    Reply
  • 18. Randy  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:30 am

    So you guys are very stupid if you don’t understand Mr. Heller’s prose. The most important thing is the concise nature of his words, how the game is played out, how it affects us all, and how unreal it is to see people who are supposed to uphold the law be concerned with the private actions of private persons, while the lawbreakings which affect us all are ignored. That is the astronaut allegory, because surely you must not be of this earth aka a space cadet, if what is important to you is the recreational habits of people in their private spaces and not the violation of those peoples’ rights en grosse and to the detriment of us all.

    Reply
  • 19. Mr Vengeful  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:35 am

    HOw is this the most scathing thing ever written?

    I think Catch 22 is one of the best novels ever, but this piece is pretty uninspiring. It sounds like something he wrote in his diary that he might return to and write properly one of these days.

    Reply
  • 20. The proof is in the pudding. « To Vote or Not to Vote?  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:45 am

    [...] 12, 2007 I’ve seen a couple of complaints about sourcing for “This Is Called National Defense“. If you look in the New York Times archive section, you can view the abstract but not the [...]

    Reply
  • 21. aguanegro  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:48 am

    I posted a screenshot of the article’s pdf file in the New York Times archive here:
    http://tovoteornottovote.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/proof-pudding/

    I hope this is clears up any questions about sourcing.

    Reply
  • 22. Sebation LeClair  |  November 12, 2007 at 3:42 am

    Too bad he didn’t call out John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson by name. I guess the idiots who forget the timelines don’t know who was in power then. Robert F Kennedy personally had Martin Luther King, Jr wiretapped but you don’t heare the so-called progressives mention a word of it…

    Reply
  • 23. trademark registration  |  November 12, 2007 at 3:57 am

    These musings of Heller’s sound a little too basic and uninspired. It really sounds like something a teen would write. That’s not to say that I disagree, but it’s just not his greatest moment.

    Reply
  • 24. dratgosy  |  November 12, 2007 at 4:03 am

    And nothing’s changed in 50 some years… the government continues to do what it does and the ignorant continue to protest the few who dare say something, anything. The rest leave their head in the sand.

    Reply
  • 25. me  |  November 12, 2007 at 7:02 am

    People who defend marijuana crack me up. And that’s not hostility. They hold themselves forth as champions of rational thought while smoking reefers. Classic.

    Reply
  • 26. grins  |  November 12, 2007 at 11:46 am

    25. me, How can you consider a mind that doesn’t leave sobriety to be rational? In order to be rational, one must be aware of the possibilities. The cloak of reality can hinder the ability to see those possibilities… but i digress… wiretapping is bad!

    Reply
  • 27. josh  |  November 12, 2007 at 12:16 pm

    Your mom’s an astronaut.

    Reply
  • 28. Seth  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:06 pm

    25. me, you sound like a real ass hole! Who says” smoking reefers”?

    Reply
  • 29. Steve  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:24 pm

    The cloak of reality can hinder the ability to see those possibilities

    Looks like quite a few on the left are ‘throwing aside the cloak of reality.’

    Reply
  • 30. cuzoogle  |  November 12, 2007 at 1:56 pm

    crazy stuff!

    Reply
  • 31. randybonifield  |  November 12, 2007 at 2:43 pm

    I seriously doubt the authenticity of this piece.

    Reply
  • 32. Steve  |  November 12, 2007 at 3:04 pm

    “I never express this disapproval aloud, of course. I would not dare mention it at the office or to my closest friend of even whisper it to my wife in the intimacy of our bedroom, because these courageous guardians of our freedom and safety might be bugging me already and would then start spitting in mine.”

    Even worse is that we’re living in a world where I find it extremely hard to express my approval of the good things our government has done.

    I believe our President’s intentions ARE good. I believe that most people fail to see -why- he is not a good public speaker, and that public speaking is not necessarily key to being an -effective- leader.

    At this point, my own country has all but imprisoned my ability to speak freely without fear of being cast out by the masses – and I’m not talking about the government… I’m talking about the inability of my fellow Americans to think clearly and second guess the opinions of movie stars and other worthless political parrots.

    Reply
  • 33. bruce  |  November 12, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    anon wrote:<>

    in the past???

    dude wake up.

    Reply
  • 34. Langx  |  November 12, 2007 at 7:10 pm

    And to think Redumblicans believe it’s ok to use wireless wiretaps and waterboard.

    They have no idea that when Hillary or Barak becomes President Rethugs will be the ones subjected to it because you know once the Dems win the Rethugs will return to there terroristic habits.

    We may have to double Guantanamo to hold the Rethug terrorist that will becoming out of the woodworks.

    They recently took down a Conservative website encouraging people to shoot doctors and people showing up for abortions.

    Reply
  • 35. Virgil  |  November 12, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    Our president is not a good leader; he has had the fortune of a weak congress that doesn’t curb steps he misguidedly takes. Most of his leadership decisions should have never been allowed.
    How has our presidents actions in any way increased national security in any meaningful way? How has our president’s policies increased our national standard of living? What sort of economic impact have his decisions had? Have you checked the exchange rate of the dollar versus other strong, traditionally stable currencies?
    Here is another angle, how many people have defaulted on home loans in the sub-prime mortage fiasco?
    Now, would good intentions be for the good of the american people without regarding to personal gain, or personal gain without regard to the good of the american people?

    Decisions made with good intention but poor foresight are still poor decisions.

    You accuse everyone else of inability to think clearly. People are not taking the opinions of public figures as their own, they are adding up the facts that are clearly visible.

    Reply
  • 36. yutthakan  |  November 12, 2007 at 9:54 pm

    hi

    Reply
  • 37. Curtis  |  November 12, 2007 at 11:51 pm

    @18 (Randy) – Very well-spoken.
    @25 (me) – I have an idea. Let’s get together, get high as f**k, and then compete to see who can (a) solve complex logarithmic equations most quickly and accurately; (b) most satisfactorily translate rudimentary (for your benefit) text passages from Latin into English and French into Koine Greek; (c) score the highest on a spatial manipulation test; and (d) outperform the other on three other intellectual tasks of your choosing. Then, with your newfound knowledge, you can revise your impudent pettifoggery with regards to reefers and rationalizations.

    Joseph Heller was one of the best. Great post: thank you, esteemed blogsmith.

    Reply
  • 38. robertroels  |  November 13, 2007 at 6:51 am

    I remember reading years ago about the FBI performing surveillance on King.

    Hoover was a snake and ran the Department as if he were God.

    These so called Intelligence agencies are anything but, and have caused more trouble in this world than they have averted. It’s about time their budgets were diverted to a health program for US citizens and their employees can try for some “honest” work on Iraq’s front lines.

    Reply
  • 39. Mobius  |  November 13, 2007 at 10:11 am

    http://www.narsil.org/politics/carter/law_day.html

    Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter’s Law Day Address

    Personally, I find this much more scathing.

    Reply
  • 40. justabill  |  November 14, 2007 at 4:42 pm

    This Is Called National Defense’

    By Joseph Heller

    November 24, 1975, Monday

    Page 35, 320 words
    http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60A12F93B5F1B7493C6AB178AD95F418785F9

    Reply

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Recent Posts

Archives

Blogroll

del.icio.us

Category Cloud

Advocates/Leaders america anti-war bush congress democrats double standard election friedman global warming government guerrillas iran iraq israel kurdistan kurds media meta middle east minorities news politics president public relations refugees terrorism turkey Uncategorized war